(Lives here in the city council) - After the municipal budget was approved at the city council meeting of 27/6/24, the council members from the 'Connected to Haifa Beitno' movement - Tatiana John (Chairman), Attorney Yaakov Borovsky and Artyom Kharchenko, submitted a proposal for an order, in which They point to the need that arises, according to them, to discuss the budget again after, according to them, there were flaws in the way the budget was approved.
Demand to hold another discussion
In the settlement proposal, they want to point out a series of flaws which, according to them, require the city council to return and hold another discussion on the issue.
The proposal lists the defects as follows:
- The budget was not discussed in the finance committee and the city council in regular headquarters work, no explanation was given for the numbers that appear in the budget books;
- The entire city plan was not presented to the finance committee and the city council;
- No budget targets were presented;
- No explanation was given for the fact how it is possible that a citizen in Haifa is budgeted for NIS 10,340 compared to a citizen in Kiryat Motzkin, who is budgeted for only 6,050 NIS and the level of service in Motzkin is high quality and higher than Haifa;
- No data was presented on the determination of a special budget as a result of the war - protectionism? Preparing to treat an evacuee and weak population?
- The education plan was not explained;
- No policy determination was given that requires a unique budget;
- Even in the purity of the budget, the budget was deeply polluted.
- A person who was recruited as a consultant to build the budget, according to him (in the media) voluntarily, is obviously prevented from helping in building the budget due to a fundamental fear of a conflict of interest as well as a suspicion of appearance.
- During the discussion, the local council member proposed an alternative budget that advocated a change in order of priorities and the issue was not put to a vote at all.
- Council member Mr. Michy Alper demanded details of the disappearance of NIS 780 million, income from the engineering director for which no explanation was given.
- The aforementioned defects are substantial and concern a proper administrator and purity of character.
- The council will be asked to discuss the proposal and vote on the proposed amendments again.
The municipality of Haifa published an advertising tender
Only on the municipality website
without any publication or mention in the newspaper
Ashkenazi Salzman office
What does the phrase city plan mean in section 2. Why don't you proofread before publishing? this
Not the first time that errors occur.
Essentially there is no transparency and rounding corners has become the norm
I have a feeling that even the old-new mayor, with all his energy and good intentions, will propose mountains and hills, but along the way he will round corners, tweet about regulations and not consider the residents.
How many months should pass for the downtown to be clean 24/7 and not just in the morning when the cleaners clean? shame!
How many more complaints will be filed about the noise of the music from the terminal in the port?
How many more complaints will be filed about dog poop in the gardens of fitness facilities or about the condition of the facilities?
Because of these so-called small things, the previous mayor fell.
Until they personally sue Amnon Ido and the municipal committee for the robbery of the city budget for upgrades to vacation standards, gifts of holiday vouchers and celebrations, trips to the sand 'for learning', compensation payments for training without any training, failure to sign clocks and inflated overtime hours - the robbery of the city budget will continue and only increase. They add tens of millions of shekels to themselves. There is no review, no supervision, and no responsibility.
I will give an explanation...black money...inflating tenders and transferring the black money in cash to private hands.A tender committee that tailors tenders.Contractors who give favors for jobs and of course municipal employees who do whatever they want including nepotism like Pakistan and here is the answer
Borowski is absolutely right. It should be investigated why there is a difference in the budget between a citizen of Haifa and a citizen of Motzkin. budgeted. True, Tzedek Borovski, everything is budgeted as it should be, the kindergartens and all the institutions seem more invested. All the residents of Motzkin are very satisfied with the service of the municipality of Motzkin to the residents. I remember that new immigrants always came to Haifa. The Haifa municipality invested in them, and all Arabs come to Haifa from the Arab villages, then the number of the poor increases and the city has to deal with increased budgets for the poor and increase the school classes, and everything goes at the expense of children born in Haifa. Less support and help for them is the fact that academic studies are, of course, Haifa Arabs entitled to support and help in academic studies and even get more than the soldiers. They are accepted in the Haifa dormitories. Now the municipality has specified payments to property taxes. We, the citizens of Haifa, will support Haifa University and the Technion. The city has decided to give them a significant discount on their property taxes. And it is clear that they are given this opportunity and our children served in the army in combat units, they did not get to live in the dormitories of the Technion and the university. I mentioned this because the children of none of them got to live in the dormitory of any of them. Shame and disgrace.
nuaj, ho
corrupt