Now, since the ceasefire has entered into force, the conclusion of the investigation into the question of who is responsible for the terrible failure to approve Aviv Gefen's performance in Yarakon Park with a gathering of 40000 people must be demanded?
The Commissioner of Police called on the public to "heed the instructions of the Home Front Command" while the Home Front Command explained that they analyzed the risk precisely, almost mathematically, according to a formula backed up by an application that relies on algorithms and came to the conclusion to allow this gathering.
In my opinion, this is the failure of arrogance and stupidity and lack of professionalism that has turned from a managerial subculture into the culture itself as fuelfrom:
1 - Warranty:
The responsibility for mental safety in Tel Aviv and in the whole country, even in a situation of a security round and even war, rests with the Israel Police. The Home Front Command is subordinate to the Israel Police, and hence the decision to evacuate or hold the performance must be the Commissioner's and everything is pending a decision by another government, which says that there is a security situation, which requires the transfer of responsibility to the Home Front Command and the subordination of the police to the Home Front - a situation that of course did not exist.
2 - Exact risks:
In war events there are no exact calculations, just as there is no concrete information. There are general situation assessments and the formula is simple - small gatherings of hundreds of people are prevented, so as not to make the general public an easy target, even in protected places.
That being the case, to risk 40,000 gathering in an unprotected place is irresponsible, contempt for human life, a challenge to all of Israel's enemies - to harm the gathering and cause an extremely heavy disaster.
Where have you been - the Minister of Internal Security, Commissioner, Superintendents, legal advisors... None of you know that the responsibility is yours?
3 - Taking responsibility:
What is more worrisome is the concern that the police did not take command and responsibility for other reasons: the Miron commission of inquiry, which has been pending for over two years, the main wrong claim there too is that the responsibility is not the police but the civil authorities, as if the disaster was caused by them!
And it is doubly serious because it was claimed and unfortunately, partially succeeded, in the Carmel disaster as if the fire and firefighting caused the disaster and not failures and negligence of command.
If it was successful there, why not continue to try to escape responsibility and risk human life in Russian Roulette!
4 - The fear of escaping justice:
The time has come to say out loud that this is a subculture that in the best case results from a lack of professionalism and a misunderstanding of the concept of responsibility and in the other case the fear of escaping the law leads to the loss of human life
5 - Demand maximum security for the rear
In all respect to the Home Front Command and the IDF, you were not allowed to back decisions not within your areas, but on the contrary - you had to demand maximum security for the home front and in no way allow such a mass gathering. Why is it forbidden to hold a wedding or a synagogue on Sderot, where the algorithms do not work?
The opposite! Improving already 91% success.
6 - Part of the National Security Council:
The National Security Council must also draw lessons from the approval of the event, because the National Security Council is the government's long arm in such issues and as decisions are certain to endanger human life, the National Security Council must bring these disputes before the government.
In conclusion
Far reaching?
Definately not!
The sanctity of life prevails over everything and their depravity necessitates the drawing of lessons from "almost the heaviest national disaster from missile firing and trampling of people while fleeing."
Nissim and Syeyata Deshamiya are not under your permanent control and do not constitute a work plan or a basis for decision-making. This is a time for in-depth, personal and organizational soul-searching.
An account must be given to the public - why this event was possible.
The dodger with the slight scoliosis in his back who could not serve as a soldier on the home front but since then goes on stage for 3 hour performances
This is the representative of the sector who shouts "equal burden" - there is no limit to hypocrisy.
I don't agree with Borovski's opinion, after all the decision was made by the command of the home front ie the army and how can the minister of internal security interfere with the decision they made in the army? After all, they would immediately blame him for not being his responsibility. Besides, let's face it, this is a performance and an audience that is mostly identified with the left and with the opponents of the reform, and they would immediately accuse that this is a political decision, why some yes and some no, etc., etc.
By and large, what is happening in these troubled days is simply a scandal, the protesters, the media and the left are in control and the government is afraid and finds it difficult to carry out almost any move (now here is the property tax fund).
This should worry us all, in my opinion, because one day (maybe) there will be a left-wing government here, and then what? The right side will go to extremes and demonstrate that dangerous precedents have already been set here.
So what will a functioning elected government be like in Israel now and in the future?
The protesters will rule and the elected officials will function according to their whims every time? So why do we all come to the elections?
There is no limit to stupidity
My friend, it seems to me that you should strive for the high office of mayor
Everything else is a waste of time
Yaakov words for girls, just go and explain to Rafi that they are playing, I think. Shmoch culture is close by. Throwing away the decision receipts like a hot potato from LG Ba'omer